Asics Corp. v. Target Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs’ ASICS Corporation and ASICS Tiger Corporation (collectively, “ASICS”) have sued Defendant Target Corporation (“Target”) alleging that Target’s PROSPIRIT brand ‘Wyat” running shoes infringe ASICS’ “stripe design” trademark. ASICS has moved for a preliminary injunction asserting that “the continued sale of the infringing shoes will cause further confusion in the marketplace and cause further irreparable harm to AS-ICS’ reputation,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Russo v. NCS Pearson, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Schutte Bagclosures Inc. v. Kwik Lok Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Doe v. LaDueDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- United States v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Miche Bag, LLC v. Marshall GroupDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.