Legal Opinion

Holland v. De Priest

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 2, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certified from St. Louis Court of Appeals. Transferred to St. Louis court of appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.

This cause was certified to this court by the St. Louis court of appeals. The appeal is from a judgment of-the Shannon circuit court, directing the sheriff of said county to pay certain employees of the McCaskill Mercantile and Lumber Company wages due them for services rendered within six months prior to the seizure of said company’s property under a writ of attachment.

We have examined the transcript carefully and the constitutionality of section 4*911, Eevised Statutes, 1889, was not mooted in any manner in the circuit court.

The St. Louis court of appeals doubted whether the question was…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Lang v. CallawaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. HordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. State v. RaymondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. J. G. Hutchinson & Co. v. Morris Bros.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API