Legal Opinion

State v. Raymond

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 8, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Transferred from Kansas City Oo.urt of Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.

The defendant was indicted in the Bates circuit court for keeping a bawdy house in violation of section 3811, Revised Statutes 1889.

She moved to quash because the indictment was too uncertain and indefinite to- apprise her of the nature of the charge against her; that it failed to charge any offense under *118the laws of this State, and for other defects as to particularity. The motion to quash was overruled and defendant excepted.

The cause went to trial and defendant was convicted, and her fine assessed at two hundred dollars.

She moved for a new trial on the ground that the court erred in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Hulett v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Lang v. CallawaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. HordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Canton v. McDanielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Horton v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  3. Jacobs v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Town of Canton v. McDanielMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API