Legal Opinion

Bourhis v. Lord

California Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2013No. S199887, S199889PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*323Opinion

CHIN, J.

If a corporation fails to pay its taxes, the state may suspend its corporate powers. The state may later revive those powers when the corporation pays its taxes. We must decide whether a corporation that files notices of appeal while its corporate powers are suspended may proceed with the appeals after those powers have been revived, even if the revival occurs after the time to appeal has expired. Two opinions from this court in the 1970’s held that revival of corporate powers validates an earlier notice of appeal. (Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp. (1973) 10 Cal.3d 351 [110…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Peacock Hill Ass'n v. Peacock Lagoon Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Traub Co. v. Coffee Break Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Reed v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Newport Harbor Ventures, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World EvangelismCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. County of Kern v. T.C.E.F., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. CamachoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Moofly Prods., LLC v. Favila, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API