State v. Simpson
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM GRIFFITH, Justice.
On original submission to this court, we addressed the State’s appeal from the granting of a motion to suppress in the case of Lionel Simpson (“Appellee”). Ap-pellee was indicted for capital murder. He was a juvenile at the time of the offense. The trial court granted Appellee’s motion to suppress his confession because the authorities violated section 52.02(b) of the Texas Family Code by not promptly notifying Appellee’s parents of his detention. We concluded that the evidence supported the trial court’s decision that Appellee’s confession was illegally obtained.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Oles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Maddox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Comer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Simpson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
- Pham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- Cortez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Lionel Simpson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2005
- Manuel Cortez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.