Legal Opinion

Howell v. Parker.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Actioet by Julia F. How&ll and another against T. S. Parker and others, heard by Judge O. U. Allen, at March Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of Stanly County. From a judgment for the plaintiffs the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClaeK, C. J.

This is a petition for partition filed before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Stanly County. M. B. Howell bought the tract of land in 1885, paid the purchase- money in full and entered into possession as owner, but died in 1889 without having received a deed, .which was executed, however, to his heirs at law by the vendor in 1891. Two of the heirs at law subsequently conveyed their two-fifths interest to the defendant Parker, who has two others of the heirs at law as co-defendants. Another heir at law and the widow of 1VI. E. Howell are the plaintiffs. It is agreed that at the time of his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Love v. . McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Askew v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. High v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. High v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. WalstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Harrington v. Harrington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Vannoy v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API