Legal Opinion

Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Walston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff’s appeal.

Stacy, J.

There are only two questions presented by plaintiff’s appeal, and they arise upon the following exceptions and assignments of error:

“1. For that his Honor erred in holding that the claim of plaintiff is allowable against the estate of W. M. Moore only to the extent of the balance due thereon after crediting dividends received in settlement of the partnership estate of Corbett & Moore.
“2. For that his Honor erred in holding that the defendant, Sue E. Moore, has not waived her dower right.”

It is the general rule in equity that partnership creditors are entitled to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Gore v. . TownsendSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Creecy v. . Pearce, Adm'r .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  4. State Ex Rel. Corporation Commission v. DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Moring v. . DickersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Pegram-West, Inc. v. Hiatt Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Zion's Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. State Tax Commission (In re Reynolds' Estate)Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Montsinger v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Jones v. CallahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API