Legal Opinion

Myers v. Catoe Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1986No. 8526SC1158PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

By their first assignment of error, defendants contend that the trial court erred in failing to grant their motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. Defendants argue that because there is uncontradicted evidence showing plaintiff breached the contract, plaintiff is precluded from recovering as a matter of law.

When considering a defendant’s motion for directed verdict, the plaintiffs evidence must be taken as true and be considered in the light most favorable to him. A directed verdict may be granted only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Robertson Ex Rel. Robertson v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Hoch v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. McAden v. . CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. McAden v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bartlett Milling Co., LP v. Walnut Grove Auction and Realty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Wake County v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. MacE v. PyattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Hasalia v. Walker (In Re Walker)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2009
  5. Shoaf v. ShoafCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API