Legal Opinion

Hoch v. Young

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1983No. 8210SC937PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The question presented for review on this appeal is whether the trial court, at the first trial of this matter, erred in failing to grant defendant’s motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Defendant offers the following two grounds in support of his contention that the court erred in denying his motions: (1) plaintiff’s own evidence established that his cause of action for conversion was barred by the three-year statute of limitations set out in G.S. 1-52(4), and (2) plaintiff failed to offer evidence as .to the fair market value of the converted…

2Cited by31 opinions

  1. White v. Consolidated Planning, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Griffith v. Glen Wood Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Stratton v. Royal Bank of CanadaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Lockerman v. S. River Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. TSC RESEARCH, LLC v. Bayer Chemicals Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API