Legal Opinion

Palmetto Linen Service, Incorporated v. U.N.X., Incorporated Nova Controls, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2000No. 99-1209PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Senior Judge CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

Palmetto Linen Service filed a tort action for damages resulting from the alleged malfunction of a chemical dispensing system used in its commercial washers. The district court dismissed Palmetto’s claims because South Carolina’s economic loss rule limits Palmetto’s remedies to contract and thus bars any tort recovery. We now affirm the judgment.

I

Palmetto operates a commercial laundry business that supplies linens to hotels,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Michael Redman v. John D. Brush and Company, D/B/A Sentry Group, Incorporated, and Value-Tique, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. City of Twin FallsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  3. Sapp v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. BASF Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
  5. Stoney v. FranklinSuffolk County Circuit Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API