Legal Opinion

Contreras v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 16, 2014No. 1:05-vv-00626PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BUSH, Senior Judge

Now pending before the court is petitioner’s motion for review of the special master’s decision on remand, see Contreras v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 05-626V, 2013 WL 6698382 (Fed.Cl.Spec.Mstr. Nov. 19, 2013) (Contreras III), 2 which denied Jessie Contreras’s petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l to -34 (2012) (the Vaccine Act). 3 Athough petitioner attacks the special master’s decision on many fronts, a threshold issue regarding the credibility of one of respondent’s experts and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  5. Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Contreras v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Bailey Jr v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Bean-Sasser v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Contreras v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. D.G. v. Secretary of Heath and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API