Legal Opinion

Dillenberg v. Carroll

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.

The injuries to Clarence Dillenberg for which recovery is sought in this action were sustained at 2:30 p. m., on November 19, 1948, while he was riding in an automobile operated by the defendant Patrick Carroll on a highway extending north and south. Along the place of the accident there was a black-top surface on the highway twenty-two to twenty-four feet wide, with the east shoulder of the roadway approximately four to five feet wide and rough and grassy; and an underground type of culvert which at its east edge had wings going to the northeast and southeast.

Two feet east of the black-top,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Truelsch v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Smith v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Reuling v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merlino v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Meyer v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Younger v. Rosenow Paper & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hasselman v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API