Legal Opinion

Hasselman v. Zimmerman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The first contention made by the plaintiffs is that Mrs. Zimmerman was negligent in the manner in which she parked the automobile as a matter of law. Plaintiffs rely upon two cases, Hughes v. Rentschler Floral Co. 193 Wis. 49, 213 N. W. 625, and Biller v. Meyer, 33 Fed. (2d) 440. In the Hughes Case the defendant’s delivery truck was parked at the curb on an incline to enable the driver to deliver a package at the house of a customer. During the absence of the driver the truck started coasting down the hill where it struck a young woman, inflicting injuries resulting in her death. In that case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hanlon v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Dillenberg v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hughes v. Rentschler Floral Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Riley v. LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API