Legal Opinion

Schillinger v. Wickersham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1917PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. E. C. Crow. Assumpsit by E. L. Schillinger against C. A. Wiekersham. Because of adverse ruling plaintiff took a non-suit and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

On account of adverse rulings of the court the plaintiff took a nonsuit with bill of exceptions. It is clear from an inspection of the record that on the last ruling on demurrer to the complainant it became necessary for plaintiff to suffer non-suit. This ruling is not reserved for the decision of the Supreme Court by bill of exceptions, but by an appeal on the record, as in other cases. The statute is as follows: “If, from any ruling or decision of the court on the trial of a cause, either upon pleadings, admission or rejection of evidence, or upon charges to the jury, it may become…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dwight Manufacturing Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Talley v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Berlin Machine Works v. Ewart L. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Sibley v. American Exchange National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Engle v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Herrmann v. Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Colbert County v. Tennessee Valley BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Foreman v. Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Logan v. O'BARRSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API