Legal Opinion

Mary R. Craddock v. Americredit Financial Services, Inc.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided July 9, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00209Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION MARY R. CRADDOCK, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:26-cv-00209 AMERICREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending is Plaintiff Mary R. Craddock’s Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. [ECF No. 21]. Defendant did not respond. For the reasons that follow, the Motion, [ECF No. 21], is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Although sur-replies are not contemplated as a matter of course by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court possesses broad discretion to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. West Virginia Housing Development Fund v. CopenhaverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Brister v. All Star Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1997
  4. Quicken Loans v. Marsha Gale Walters, AdministratrixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Lillian Vogt v. Progressive Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API