Mary R. Craddock v. Americredit Financial Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION MARY R. CRADDOCK, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:26-cv-00209 AMERICREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending is Plaintiff Mary R. Craddock’s Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. [ECF No. 21]. Defendant did not respond. For the reasons that follow, the Motion, [ECF No. 21], is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Although sur-replies are not contemplated as a matter of course by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court possesses broad discretion to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State Ex Rel. West Virginia Housing Development Fund v. CopenhaverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
- Brister v. All Star Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1997
- Quicken Loans v. Marsha Gale Walters, AdministratrixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
- Lillian Vogt v. Progressive Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025