Legal Opinion

Quicken Loans v. Marsha Gale Walters, Administratrix

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2017No. 16-0298SeparateCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice:

Following a five-day trial in the Circuit Court of Raleigh County^ West Virginia, a jury found that Petitioner Quicken Loans, Inc. (“Quicken Loans”) violated the “illegal loan”, provision of the West Virginia Residential Mortgage Lender, Broker and Servicer Act, West Virginia Code § Sl-W-SCm)®1 in originating a primary mortgage loan for Respondent Sue Walters2 and was liable to Ms. Walters for damages in the amount of $27,000.00. The jury found in favor of Quicken Loans oh Ms. Walters’s claim of fraud, and further found that Quicken Loans had not acted with malice.

Significantly…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chrystal R.M. v. Charlie A.L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burgess v. PorterfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PitroloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Vest v. CobbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gregory v. Toler Appraisal Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2023
  2. Mary R. Craddock v. Americredit Financial Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API