Legal Opinion

United States v. Howard Grant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 8, 2012No. 11-20013PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:

After a jury trial, defendants Dr. Howard Grant (“Grant”), Obisike Nwankwo (“Nwankwo”), and Clinton Lee (“Lee”) were convicted of conspiracy to commit health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. Grant also was convicted of two counts of aiding and abetting health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1347 and 2.

Grant, Nwankwo, and Lee each appeal their convictions, claiming insufficiency of the evidence. Grant also raises the following three issues on appeal: (1) whether the district court plainly erred by admitting co-conspirator Doris Vinitski’s…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. United States v. Gilbert IsgarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Norberto AlanizCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Matthew SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Elechi OtiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Mark KuhrtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API