Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Kuhrt

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2015No. 13-20115PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Mark Kuhrt and Gilbert Lopez challenge their convictions and sentences on multiple counts of wire fraud and conspiracy. Appellants argue insufficiency of the evidence and errors at trial, involving the district court’s jury instructions and exclusion of certain expert testimony. Appellants also assert numerous procedural and substantive errors regarding then-sentences. We AFFIRM.

I

Kuhrt and Lopez were both employees of Allen Stanford’s investment companies for over a decade. During that time, Stanford ran a multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme and…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Life Partners Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Elechi OtiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Walter ReedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Peter HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Daniel StanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API