Legal Opinion

Rich v. City of Benicia

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1979No. Civ. 37774PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

Neel S. Rich (Rich) sued the City of Benicia (Benicia) and several individual defendants to compel preparation of an environmental impact report. After the parties had resolved the environmental issues, by stipulation, early in the proceedings, the trial court, upon motion, awarded attorney fees to Rich on a “private attorney general” theory. Both Rich and Benicia appeal from the attorney-fee order. We affirm.

The record contains scant factual information as to the underlying controversy. From Rich’s complaint it appears that an old house in Benicia, locally known as the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Unida v. VolpeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Press v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Beach Colony II v. California Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API