Legal Opinion
State v. Sanner Contracting Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1973No. 2645PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Chief Justice.
This proceeding was brought before this court on a question of law certified by the Superior Court of Maricopa County pursuant to Rule 346 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.
On September IS, 1972, an information was filed against defendant for the crime of air pollution, a misdemeanor. The information accused Sanner Contracting Company of using and altering an operl area without taking reasonable precautions to prevent particular matter (dust) froni becoming airborne or windborne, all in vio* lation of Rule 31(A) of the Maricopa County Air Pollution Regulations…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BerryArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Smith v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- State v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- State v. KrugArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Sarasota County v. BargSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- State v. YabeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State v. SchonerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Ariz. Civil Rights Div. v. Hughes Air Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.