People v. James
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because the record does not establish whether defendant was present at the Sandoval conference, we reserve decision and remit the matter to Niagara County Court for a reconstruction hearing to expand the record and to determine whether defendant was present (see, People v Michalek, 82 NY2d 906; People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872; People v Koberstein, 206 AD2d 928; People v Mitchell, 189 AD2d 337). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. MichalekNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. OdiatNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. KobersteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. DulacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994