Legal Opinion

People v. James

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because the record does not establish whether defendant was present at the Sandoval conference, we reserve decision and remit the matter to Niagara County Court for a reconstruction hearing to expand the record and to determine whether defendant was present (see, People v Michalek, 82 NY2d 906; People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872; People v Koberstein, 206 AD2d 928; People v Mitchell, 189 AD2d 337). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MichalekNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. OdiatNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. KobersteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. DulacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API