Legal Opinion
People v. James
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. The People conceded that a reconstruction hearing was required to determine whether defendant was present at a Sandoval hearing at which County Court concluded that defendant could be asked on cross-examination if he had ever been convicted of a crime (People v James, 207 AD2d 1028). At the reconstruction hearing conducted by the Trial Judge, there was conflicting testimony regarding where the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. . GaimariNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. MichalekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. IrelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. TimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020