Legal Opinion

People v. Dulac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Case held, decision *1046reserved and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The People candidly concede that, because the record does not establish whether defendant was present at a Sandoval conference, the case must be remitted to Niagara County Court for a reconstruction hearing to expand the record and to determine whether defendant was present (see, People v Michalek, 82 NY2d 906; People v James, 207 AD2d 1028; People v Mitchell, 189 AD2d 337). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Sodomy, 1st…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MichalekNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DulacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API