Legal Opinion

State v. City Court of City of Tucson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1986No. 18205PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

This matter, transferred from the court of appeals pursuant to Rule 19, Ariz.R.Civil App.P., 17A A.R.S., was brought by the Tucson City Court and its Chief Magistrate, The Honorable Ann Bowen, challenging an adverse ruling by the Pima County Superior Court and The Honorable Lillian Fisher, Judge. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3).

We must decide only two issues:

1. Whether a policy of the Chief City Prosecutor that requires all Deputy City Prosecutors to routinely disqualify a certain City Court Magistrate, the Honorable Fernando Fajardo, in all DUI…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. PettittWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. BlazakArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Mitchell v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR PIMA CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hare v. SUPER. COURT, IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Espinoza v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Traynor v. LeclercNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API