State ex rel. Miller v. Lichtenberg
Washington Supreme Court
Original Application for Mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, J. —
The relators presented their complaint to the defendantherein, and, on the ground that an emergency was made to appear showing that relief should be granted without notice to the other party, obtained an order requiring *408such adverse party to show cause on a day certain why a temporary injunction should not be granted, and that in the meantime he berestrainedfrom doing certain acts mentioned in the order of the court. Before hearing was had upon the application for the temporary injunction such proceedings were had in the cause that the court…
2Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pay Less Drug Stores v. SuttonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Labbitt v. BunstonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Larsen v. WinderWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- In re GroenWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Rockford Watch Co. v. RumpfWashington Supreme Court · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.