Bachman v. Independence Indemnity Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action to recover on a policy of indemnity insurance. On June 19, 1927, Mrs. Katie Bachman requested Forest Bayliss, her son-in-law, to drive her automobile for her on a trip. He consented, and on the highway negligently drove it over an embankment. She was killed and other passengers were injured.
Mrs. Bachman had previously secured a policy of indemnity insurance from defendant company covering her automobile, which provided in part as follows: “ ... if, during the term of this policy ... by reason of its ownership, maintenance or use at any location within the United…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by26 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Atlantic National Insurance v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- MacBey v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Bachman v. Independence Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cain v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.