Legal Opinion

Donnell v. Linforth

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1935No. Civ. 9494PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff in a libel action appeals from an adverse judgment granted after the demurrers of the defendant Market Street Railway Company and of the defendants Walter H. Linforth and William M. Cannon had been sustained without leave to amend. In brief, the complaint alleged that, in an action for personal injuries brought against the defendant Market Street Railway Company, plaintiff had previously testified against such defendant; that such defendant and the other defendants, as its attorneys, in support of a motion for a new trial, had filed in such action two…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Snively v. Record Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Gosewisch v. DoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Camron v. KenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. United States v. ShibleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  5. Zamarello v. YaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API