Legal Opinion
Padula v. Padula
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 10, 1951PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
This suit was instituted by Liberto Padula *104and Guiseppe Amaróse against Genevieve Padula, administratrix of the estate of Joseph Padula. Pending the action Amaróse died and his administratrix, Lena Caviasco, was substituted as a party plaintiff. Philip J. Padula was cited in as an additional defendant.
Following a plethora of pleadings, the plaintiffs finally filed an amended complaint in two counts. The first alleged the following facts: In 1915 Amaróse was the owner of a run-down farm in the town of Wolcott. In that year he orally agreed with his son-in-law, Liberto Padula, that he would…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- McDonald v. Hartford Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Cone v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Clark v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
- Park v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Wadsworth Realty Co. v. SundbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.