Legal Opinion
Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. Slaby
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 12, 1988No. 86-3664PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILBURN, Circuit Judge.
Intervenor-appellant State of Ohio appeals the judgment of the district court declaring Ohio Amended Substitute House Bill 319 (H.B. 319) unconstitutional. H.B. 319, which enacted Ohio Rev.Code §§ 2151.85 and 2505.073 and amended Ohio Rev.Code § 2919.12, requires parental notification by physicians who'intend to perform abortions on unmarried, unemanci-pated women under the age of eighteen. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
On March 21, 1986, plaintiffs filed an action challenging the constitutionality of H.B. 319 (attached hereto as Appendix I) which requires…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Repola v. Morbark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Taylor v. PhelanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Young Radiator Co. v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Summit Medical Associates, P.C. v. JamesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.