Legal Opinion
Repola v. Morbark Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 3, 1992No. Nos. 92-5172, 92-5293PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLO VITER, Chief Judge.
Defendant Morbark Industries, Inc. has filed an interlocutory appeal certified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). It challenges the district court’s order requiring that it participate in a retrial of plaintiffs prod-, ucts liability claims despite the fact that it was found not liable by the jury at the first trial and was not a party to the appeal taken by its co-defendant.
I
Facts and Procedural History
This products liability action by plaintiff Daniel Repola against defendants Morbark Industries, Inc. (“Morbark Industries”) and Morbark Pennsylvania,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Repola v. Morbark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Abraham Linc Corporation v. Spinnaker Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2024
- Allen v. Antero Resources CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2024
- Balise v. JacksonDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2024
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.