Legal Opinion

In Re Gamo

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1932No. Docket No. 2198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRICKE, J., pro tem.

Petitioner was on March 2, 1932, tried and convicted in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County of the crime of contributing to the delinquency of a minor (sec. 21, Juvenile Court Act), and sentenced to serve two years in the county jail, the last year of such sentence to be suspended.

The sole contention of petitioner is that the superior court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the jurisdiction of the offense charged is vested exclusively in the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles.

The state Constitution declares that “the superior court shall have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. In Re Application of LunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Matter of Application of WestenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. People v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Andrews v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Rocklite Products v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API