Legal Opinion

Druley v. Peyton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1944No. Civ. No. 14403PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $939.49, after trial before the court without a jury, in an action to recover a sum of money alleged to be due pursuant to an agreement between plaintiff and defendant, defendant appeals.

There is also an appeal from the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and to enter another and different judgment.

The essential allegations in the complaint are that:(1) On or about April 18, 1940, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement whereby defendant agreed to acquire, on behalf of himself , and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hammell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Consolidated Adjustment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Sellery v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Frost v. MighettoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Warfield v. BassoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API