Murray v. Detroit Wire Spring Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge. Suit in equity by William A. Murray against the Detroit Wire Spring Company. From final decree, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Appeal from the accounting decree in suit for infringement of patent No. 692,535 to Murray upon spring seat. Defendant’s so-called “four-hole strip,” which was originally the only structure in issue, had been held to infringe. Murray v. Detroit Wire Spring Co., 206 Fed. 465, 124 C. C. A. 371. On the accounting it appeared that defendant had discontinued the manufacture and sale of the four-hole strip -at about the time the bill for infringement was filed, and had since been making and selling a “three-hole strip,” which it claimed did not infringe. The master held the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Murray v. Detroit Wire Spring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Murray v. D'arcyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- Murray v. C. L. Greeno Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hazeltine Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932