Legal Opinion

Murray v. D'arcy

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1908No. 1,769PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan.

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, who was complainant below, charges the defendant in this bill with infringing the rights secured to him by letters patent No. 692,535, issued February 4, 1902, for improvements in spring seats. The claims which are said to be infringed are tire first, third, and fifth, as follows:

“1. In a spring seat, the combination of a seat-frame, metal cross-strips having inturned edges with perforations, and flat upturned hangers at the ends to he secured to the frame, and coiled springs whose ends engage the perforations in the cross-strips, substantially as shown…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Carriage Co. v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sheffield Car. Co. v. D'ArcyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  2. Trussed Concrete Steel Co. v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. Murray v. C. L. Greeno Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  4. Murray v. Detroit Wire Spring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  5. Murray v. Detroit Wire Spring Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API