Legal Opinion

United States v. Pierce

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 8, 1994No. ACMR 9202428PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION EN BANC

CREAN, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of rape, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Jus*585tice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for four years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private E1.

In a unanimous opinion dated 10 December 1993, and served on counsel 3 January 1994, a panel of this court set aside the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. PolkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. HouserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. American-Foreign Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. PierceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API