Ford v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted of robbery by assault; the punishment twenty (20) years.
Court appointed counsel for appellant has filed a brief in which he states that in his opinion the appeal is frivolous and without merit. He has so informed appellant, and furnished him with a copy of the brief, but appellant has not filed a pro se brief. The procedure has complied with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, and Gainous v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 436 S.W.2d 137.
Nevertheless, in a diligent effort to perform his entire duty, counsel presents to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Ferrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- O'NEAL v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.