Legal Opinion

Filtration Development Co., LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 17, 2004No. 03-2835CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs motion alleging that the Department of the Army (Army) violated the court’s April 13, 2004, opinion and order by invoking, for a second time, the unusual and compelling urgency exception to the Competition In Contracting Act (CICA) to procure engine inlet barrier filters (IBF) for the UH-60 Black-hawk helicopter. Plaintiff maintains that the court possesses statutory and inherent authority to enforce its prior orders. Plaintiff also asks the court to hold defendant in contempt or, in the alternative, to require…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Turner Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Savantage Financial Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Filtration Development Co., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Mission Critical Solutions v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API