Legal Opinion

State v. Wiggins

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 28, 2003No. AC 22217PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant, Jimmy L. Wiggins, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sale of cocaine in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the court improperly refused to instruct the jury on cross-*705racial identification as requested by the defendant. We conclude that the defendant was not entitled to such an instruction and, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On the evening of November 4, 1998, Michael Cancellaro, an undercover police…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. State v. CromedySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. State v. McClendonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. CerilliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API