Legal Opinion

Del Castillo v. Wells

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 11, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2133PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

This is an action on a promissory note which was allegedly in default. The appellants-defendants answered setting forth affirmative defenses. Subsequently, they appeared by new counsel and moved for permission to file an amended answer and counterclaim. They also sought to change the trial judge by filing an affidavit of bias and prejudice pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-409 and demanded a trial by jury.

Three questions are raised for consideration on this appeal dealing with the timeliness of the application for change of judge, the timeliness of the request for a jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marsin v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Burney v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Liston v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Hofstra v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Itasca State Bank v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Brush Wellman, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Lewis v. KelliherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. RACKMASTER SYSTEMS, INC. v. MaderiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API