Legal Opinion
Itasca State Bank v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 4, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 585PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
The petitioner, hereinafter referred to as “the bank”, seeks intervention of this court by way of extraordinary writ to review a refusal by the respondent judge to assign a show cause hearing to another judge.
On November 13, 1967, the bank instituted an action upon promissory notes against Kenneth M. Heidorn, nephew of the real party in interest. (Cause No. 24539) The defendant failed to respond within the time prescribed by law, and the bank entered his default. On April 8, 1968, in accordance with Rule 55b (2), 16 A.R.S., a hearing was held by the respondent judge on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Marsin v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Estate of CuneoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Hordyk v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- J. R. Francis Construction Co. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Anonymous v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Del Castillo v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- City of Sierra Vista v. Cochise Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Gant v. HelmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.