Legal Opinion

Rhue v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided November 28, 2017No. B283248Published

1Opinion of the CourtZelon, Acting P.J.

*894In California, litigants who comply with relevant statutes and rules have a right to appeal an adverse judgment; the trial court may not arbitrarily deny a litigant that right. In this matter, the trial court refused a timely request by petitioner to preserve a record so that she might appeal. Because the trial court abused its discretion in doing so, we grant the petitioner's request for a writ of mandate and order the preparation of a settled statement.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Petitioner Harolyn Rhue sued Signet Domain, LLC and Sam Nam (real parties in interest) in August 2015, in an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Chodos v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Jade Fashion & Co. v. Harkham Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API