Rhue v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtZelon, Acting P.J.
*894In California, litigants who comply with relevant statutes and rules have a right to appeal an adverse judgment; the trial court may not arbitrarily deny a litigant that right. In this matter, the trial court refused a timely request by petitioner to preserve a record so that she might appeal. Because the trial court abused its discretion in doing so, we grant the petitioner's request for a writ of mandate and order the preparation of a settled statement.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
Petitioner Harolyn Rhue sued Signet Domain, LLC and Sam Nam (real parties in interest) in August 2015, in an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Chodos v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Jade Fashion & Co. v. Harkham Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.