Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Furno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 2, 1983, which ruled that claimant, a home appliance demonstrator, and those similarly situated, were employees rather than independent contractors. 11 Panasonic Company, Division of Matsushita Electric Corporation of America (Panasonic), markets home appliances, including microwave ovens. Claimant and others similarly situated (hereinafter referred to collectively as a demonstrator) is both a demonstrator of and cooking instructor for microwave ovens. Initial contact between Panasonic and a demonstrator is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re Eastern Suffolk School of Music, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Nurse Care Registry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. In re the Claim of LucasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. In re the Claim of RiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re SantamoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. In re Arkwin Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API