Legal Opinion
County of Los Angeles v. Margulis
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 9, 1935No. Civ. 9476PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRICKE, J., pro tem.
Appeal by Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company of New York from a judgment against defendants.
Defendants Margulis and Stulman subdivided a tract of land in unincorporated territory of the County of Los Angeles and prepared a map or plat thereof showing the lots, parcels, streets and certain avenues and alleys which were to be devoted to public use, which map contained a certificate of dedication of the streets, avenues and alleys. On July 29, 1926, the County of Los Angeles entered into an agreement with Margulis and Stulman as the other party, and called the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bacigalupi v. Phoenix Building & Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- City of Charles City v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Weinreich Estate Co. v. A. J. Johnston Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Taylor v. North Pacific Coast RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- General Insurance Co. of America v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Morro Palisades Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Merced v. American Motorists InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- County of Yuba v. Central Valley National Bank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- County of Kern v. Edgemont Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.