Legal Opinion
Armor Bronze & Silver Co. v. Chittick
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 4, 1963No. Civ. 9840PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
Findings of Fact:
1. Armor Bronze & Silver Co., Inc. is a Massachusetts corporation having its manufacturing plant and principal place of business in Taunton, Massachusetts-It makes and sells merchandise made of copper. Its sales division operated under the name of Coppercraft Guild. It is the plaintiff in this action and will hereinafter be referred to as “Armor”. The-defendant is a citizen of Connecticut.
2. Armor’s gross national sales in 1962 amounted to $5,280,000. Five per cent, or $264,000 worth of these sales-originated in Connecticut. It has not qualified with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Electric Regulator Corp. v. Sterling Extruder Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- Matter of BowersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
- C. H. Stuart, Inc. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Eutectic Corporation v. Curtis Noll CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1972
- Apolinario v. Avco Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.