Legal Opinion
C. H. Stuart, Inc. v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 23, 1980No. 52379PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal by C. H. Stuart, Inc. (“Sarah Coventry”), from an order of the District Court of Oklahoma County dismissing its cause. Sarah Coventry sought damages and an injunction against Ben and Diane Bennett for breach of an employment contract. The district court found that Sarah Coventry had engaged in business in Oklahoma without domesticating or filing a trade name report, and was therefore foreclosed from suing in Oklahoma courts by our corporations statutes, 18 O.S. 1971, §§ 1.201(a), 1.11b.
I
C. H. Stuart, Inc. is engaged in the business of selling costume…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- B. K. Sweeney Co. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. Ex Rel. Sringfield Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Fuller v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Continental Supply Co. v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- MTG Guarnieri Manufacturing, Inc. v. ClouatreCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Vanco v. Sportsmax, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Estate of Stuart v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- HAYES v. LOGISTICARE SOLUTIONSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.