Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Mohammed

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1920No. 15799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Taylor, J., entered November 4, 1918, dismissing a petition in intervention, in an action for rent and to recover on a promissory note, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is an action brought by M. C. Peterson and wife against Fateh Mohammed, M. Dean, and Ali Mohammed, to recover rent claimed to have been .due under a written lease, and also upon a promissory note. In the action a writ of attachment was issued and certain personal property, alleged to have belonged to the defendants, was levied upon. Mohammed Box filed his petition in intervention, alleging his ownership of the property, and asking that the lien of the attachment be discharged. By order of the trial court, the sheriff was brought in and made a party defendant in the intervention…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parker v. DacresWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Mason v. VestalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Dennis v. Kass & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Archer v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  5. Miami County National Bank v. BarkalowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bond v. WerleyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Moser v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API