Mason v. Vestal
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The suit was brought against the sheriff to recover for property seized at the suit of L. Newcomer against James Gleason, who is a brother of the plaintiff. The answer denies the title and possession of plaintiff, justifies under the writ, and avers title in Gleason.
Plaintiff derives her title from Gleason, and at the trial the controversy was as to the validity of the transfer to her. The questions raised relate almost entirely *397to alleged erroneous rulings in the admission of evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. DoyellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Barkly v. CopelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Butler v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Sukeforth v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Albertoli v. BranhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Davis v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.