Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rose v. Village of Peninsula

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 1, 1993No. 5:93CV1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SAM H. BELL, District Judge.

Now pending before the court are three motions to dismiss. The first was filed on behalf of all defendants (docket #11). The second was filed on behalf of defendant Redmon based on qualified immunity (docket # 12). The last motion to dismiss was filed on behalf of defendant Ruoff based on theories of judicial and qualified immunity.

The complaint is divided between factual allegations by plaintiff Rose and factual aliegations by plaintiff Becker. ”

THE ROSE ALLEGATIONS

Rose alleges that Mayor Ruoff, Officer Redmon and the Village replaced signs on State Route 303…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DePiero v. City of MacedoniaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Depiero v. City Of MacedoniaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Belezos v. Board of Selectmen of Hingham, MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  4. Belezos v. Board of Selectmen of Hingham, MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  5. Reid MacHinery, Inc. v. LanzerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API