City of Birmingham v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Action against a city for personal injuries resulting from negligence in maintaining a public sidewalk.
Amended count 2, on which the cause was tried, alleged that plaintiff was walking on and along the sidewalk, part of a public highway in the city.
This was the use for which sidewalks are made, and discloses a duty of the city to maintain same in a reasonably safe condition for the use of pedestrians.
The count then charges that while plaintiff was walking on and along the sidewalk at a designated point, “she fell into a hole, depression or excavation in said sidewalk, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Yarbrough v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Alabama Baptist Hospital Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- City of Montgomery v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Lord v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alabama Power Company v. GuySupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Brown v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Alabama Gas Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- City of Birmingham v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- City of Birmingham v. MonetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.