Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1935No. 6 Div. 651PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Action against a city for personal injuries resulting from negligence in maintaining a public sidewalk.

Amended count 2, on which the cause was tried, alleged that plaintiff was walking on and along the sidewalk, part of a public highway in the city.

This was the use for which sidewalks are made, and discloses a duty of the city to maintain same in a reasonably safe condition for the use of pedestrians.

The count then charges that while plaintiff was walking on and along the sidewalk at a designated point, “she fell into a hole, depression or excavation in said sidewalk, which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Yarbrough v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Alabama Baptist Hospital Board v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. City of Montgomery v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Lord v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Company v. GuySupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. Brown v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Alabama Gas Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. City of Birmingham v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. City of Birmingham v. MonetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API