Legal Opinion
Chickamauga Properties, Inc. v. Barnard
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 2006No. 36A01-0510-CV-444PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Chickamauga Properties, Inc., appeals a judgment in favor of Hershall and Joyce Barnard. Because the trial court correctly determined the Barnards have a prescriptive easement across Chickamauga’s property, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Description of Property
This dispute involves three parcels of land, which were part of a 27.779-acre square piece of property (“original tract”) sold by the United States in 1956. Parcel 11 is a 6.945-acre square from the southwest corner of the original tract. Chicka-mauga has owned Parcel 11 since 1997. 1 Parcels 12 and 12.1,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- AmRhein v. EdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Bauer v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Seymour Water Co. v. LeblineIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Altevogt v. BrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Celebration Worship Center, Inc. v. Patrick Tucker and Carolyn P. Tucker, A/K/A Patty TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Garriott v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Jeffrey B. Morgan and Wendi S. Morgan v. Andrew White and Holly WhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Brad A. Altevogt v. Dennis L. BrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.